Important Action at Law

Made With Serif WebPlus.

Subscribe to Podcasts or Connect via social media

On March 1, 2013, David Alan Carmichael filed suit in the United States District Court, Eastern Virginia, Richmond District, against Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary, U.S. Health and Human Services; the Commonwealth of Virginia; and Carolyn W. Colvin, Commissioner, Social Security

Civil Action for Declaratory Judgment, Injunction

and Equitable Relief not sounding in tort

David Alan Carmichael v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al.

Sebelius - Motion to Dismiss Rule 12(b)(6) - Failure to State a Claim Upon Which The Court May Grant Relief

Initial Complaint - 3:13cv129


... Against Kathleen Sebelius and Carolyn W. Colvin in their official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services and Commissioner of Social Security respectively; against the Commonwealth of Virginia for unlawful

05.10.13

03.01.13

Links to Case Documents

Carmichael Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment

Carmichael Response to

Sebelius Motion to Dismiss

06.14.13

06.14.13

Carmichael Memorandum In Support of Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment

06.14.13

Virginia Attorney General - Motion to Dismiss Rule 12(b)(6) - Failure to State a Claim Upon Which The Court May Grant Relief, Res Judicata, Fel;dman Rooker Rule

VIRGINIA - Motion To Dismiss - Rooker - Feldman Doctrine and res judicata

06.13.13

06.13.13

U.S. Government Motion To Dismiss

Carmichael Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment - 3rd, 5th, 7th C.oA.

Virginia Government Motions

Sebelius Opposition To Carmichael Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment

06.27.13

Carmichael Reply To Sebelius Opposition To Motion For Summary Judgment

07.01.13

Carmichael Response To Virginia’s Motion To Dismiss, Rule12(b)(6) - Failure to State a Claim Upon Which The Court May Grant Relief, res judicata, etc.

07.5.13

U.S. District Court

Dismissal - 23 Oct 2013


Court Order

Memorandum

Appeal to the 4th Circuit


Appellant Informal Brief


Issues on Appeal


Sebelius Response


Virginia Response


Carmichael Reply to Sebelius


Carmichael Reply to Virginia


Judgement


Appellant Re-Hearing En Banc Motion